Friday, May 27, 2011

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU—YOU'RE A LIAR:  An interesting question I saw someone pose on a message board recently and I've been batting around with friends: prior to Adolf Hitler, who was America's go-to "so-and-so is worse than [X]" historical comparison in common parlance?  Related, before one could be considered as smart as Einstein or a rocket scientist, what individuals and professions were similarly esteemed?

21 comments:

  1. girard319:25 AM

    I'm going to open the bidding with "the Kaiser".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Carmichael Harold9:27 AM

    I was coming to type the same thing, but that probably only gets you back to WWI.   Before that, I wouldn't be surprised if below the Mason-Dixon line it was Lincoln, and, maybe Jefferson Davis in the North.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tosy and Cosh9:31 AM

    Still trying to parse the Dylan reference - unless that's your guess, Adam?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Back when Wilson proposed the WorldStateLeagueOfNations, true patriots matched with signs likening him to George III.  

    ReplyDelete
  5. Watts9:31 AM

    Rasputin has to get some votes, right?  And never forget a classic: Satan.

    ReplyDelete
  6. <span>Back when Wilson proposed the WorldStateLeagueOfNations, true patriots marchedched with signs likening him to George III.  </span>

    ReplyDelete
  7. Back when Comrade Wilson proposed the OneStateLeagueOfNations, true Patriots marched with signs likening him to George III.  (Indeed, they claimed he was BOTH a monarchist and an anarcho-syndicalist, which makes no sense whatsoever.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Meghan9:34 AM

    1. Benedict Arnold?

    2. Ben Franklin?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I imagine there was more demographic variatin prior to the emergence of America as a world power and the revelation of the genocidal madness of Nazi Germany.  Satan.  King George.  The Pope.  I'm sure avatars of variously despised minorities (be they indigenous people, sectarian rivals, more recent immigrants, old-world enemies, etc.) had currency in one social group or another.

    ReplyDelete
  10. the2scoops9:44 AM

    Ivan the Terrible? Maybe Genghis Khan.

    Unless it turns out Edison was a smug jerk with his telegraph and non-tipping chair.

    ReplyDelete
  11. One friend posited that pre-Hitler, there was no one go-to figure of evil and it depended on the type of evil being displayed.  For betrayal, it's Benedict Arnold or Judas. For mass murder and brutality, maybe Genghis Khan or Atilla the Hun.  Etc.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tosy and Cosh10:08 AM

    "Play it f***ing loud!"

    ReplyDelete
  13. Eric J.10:24 AM

    Likewise, who was the exemplar of loose morals and slovenly personal habits before Your Mom?

    ReplyDelete
  14. isaac_spaceman10:46 AM

    I think I remember that in reading Golden Age comic books, they do tend to use "Attila" as shorthand for brutality, so I'll co-sign.  Judas is another.  Also, "the Jews." 

    ReplyDelete
  15. Heather K10:54 AM

    Your grandma.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Adam C.11:10 AM

    There's also the common phrase "to the right of Attila the Hun," although that seems to me to be a modern invention born of something other than Attila's actual political leanings (which, without getting into verboten topics, don't seem to match up very well with, um, anyone).

    ReplyDelete
  17. bella wilfer1:31 PM

    Merely "liking" this comment (and Emily & Heather K's below responses) feels inadequate for how hard it made me laugh.  Well-played, people.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dante had Brutus, Judas, and Cassius in the lowest ring of hell, which my iPad wants to spell as he'll.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr. Cosmo4:20 PM

    I strongly suspect it was either Ghengis Khan or Napolean -- after the great European wars of the 20th century, people tend to forget that Napolean raised an army that was an order of magnitude larger than anything Europe had previously seen, and that for 10 years, he was totally unstoppable.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The "worse than Hitler" phrasing is very much a concept of postmodern irony. I don't think there's an early twentieth century version. Remember, the idea that satire and other forms of offensive speech merited legal protection is a relatively recent development. There's no 1890s version of Paul Krassner.

    ReplyDelete