Friday, February 19, 2010

SO SORRY: Isaac has already discussed the upcoming Tiger Woods apologizapalozza, but hey, it gave EW an excuse to link to Dan Rydell's apology, so there's something worthwhile as a result, right?

6 comments:

  1. Latest, actually wagerable odds from BoDog.com now include:

    Will Tiger Woods wipe a tear from his face during his statement on February 19th? Yes: +190No: -250

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a serious note: what's good about this statement, PR-wise, is the use of blunt first person language -- I cheated, I took advantage, etc.  No wussy passive voice evasion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. isaac_spaceman11:35 AM

    For what it's worth, I didn't (and wouldn't) cover the Tiger Woods apology itself.  I care far less about that than I care about Dan Rydell's apology (which, admittedly, is something about which I care a lot).  What I posted about was the news coverage of the announcement that an apology would be forthcoming.  The fact that a news program (even airport HLN) could spend a half-hour discussing somebody's announcement that he will make a statement two days later, particularly on a topic as tawdry and unimportant as the TIGER SEX SCANDAL!!!!!!!!!, is mystifying to me. 

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marsha11:53 AM

    Thank goodness our long national nightmare is over.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I watched it online at MSNBC, and when they broke in with that "NBC Special Report" music, you know that really pompous music they use for Meet the Press also -- da da da da-da-da-da-da, DAH DAH DAH DAH -- that says "something of major importance just happened" -- it made me burst out laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. bill.5:06 PM

    Too bad, I was hoping for a "Repo Man" kind of apology: I know a life of crime led me to this sorry fate... And yet, I blame society. Society made me what I am.

    ReplyDelete