Monday, January 11, 2010

THE 'X' DOES NOT STAND FOR XTINA: So, you may be wondering, what distinguishes X-Factor from American Idol? Based on my conversations with friends who've spent time in the UK and osmosis over the years, here's the basics:
  • Eligibility is broader, including older singers and singing groups. That said, a group has never won the competition, nor has an over-24 performer since the show's first season in 2004. This, not Pop Idol, is the one Leona Lewis won.
  • Audition rounds may be held in front of live audiences instead of in a private room.
  • Judges play a more active role in the process and take ownership over various groups of performers -- one judge will mentor the ladies under 24, another the under-24 men, another the older performers and one for the singing groups. After the X-equivalent of the Hollywood Round, there's a series of episodes where the judges put their own groups through a sort of boot camp at luxurious remote locations, honing their skills. Each judge eliminates half his/her assigned performers, bringing us down to 12 acts for the live performance rounds.
  • Accordingly, the coaches have an explicit rooting interest in their people when it comes to the live performance rounds -- they lobby for and defend their mentees, and there's no pretense of impartiality.
  • Performance rounds may involve backup dancers.
  • A member of the Minogue family may judge.
  • Eliminations are different -- public vote reduces it to a bottom two each week; they perform again; judges decide who goes home. If the four judges tie, then the public vote decides it.
  • At the completion of the series, full voting results for each week (including percentages) are released.
  • But otherwise, it's a lot like Idol.

2 comments:

  1. I also think that I saw that judges have a lot of say as to what songs the contestants sing.  They may even have a say as to how the contestants interpret the song.  Which decreases the chances of a "thinking outside the box" sort of performance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Scott2:02 PM

    There's a lot to like about that elimination structure (and the later transparency as well).

    ReplyDelete